Regressed in 6.1.0 in 62e249a1f9.
The `x` is an `str` but is expected to be a `pathlib.Path`. Not caught
by mypy because `config.getini()` returns `Any`.
Fix by just removing the `bestrelpath` call:
- testpaths are always relative to the rootdir, it thus would be very
unusual to specify an absolute path there.
- The code was wrong even before the regression: `py.path.local`'s
`bestrelpath` function expects a `py.path.local`, not an `str`. But it
had some weird `try ... except AttributeError` fallback which just
returns the argument, i.e. it was a no-op. So there is no behavior
change.
- It seems reasonable to me to just print the full path if that's what
the ini specifies.
When switching from py.path.local to pathlib (70f3ad1c1f),
`local.parts(reverse=True)` was translated incorrectly, leading to the
wrong rootdir being determined in some non-trivial cases where parent
directories have config files as well.
This indicates at least for people using type checkers that these
classes are not designed for inheritance and we make no stability
guarantees regarding inheritance of them.
Currently this doesn't show up in the docs. Sphinx does actually support
`@final`, however it only works when imported directly from `typing`,
while we import from `_pytest.compat`.
In the future there might also be a `@sealed` decorator which would
cover some more cases.
Usually, we use semi-colon punctuation mark to connect closely related
ideas. Sentences which are after semicolon, begins with small letter,
and last sentence always ends with a period mark, see "Garner's Modern
American Usage" book for more information about usage of punctuation
mark. So removing punctuation mark altogether is a good idea, as
@gnikonorov suggested [1].
[1]: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/7760#pullrequestreview-489232607
For decorated functions, the lineno of the FunctionDef AST node points
to the `def` line, not to the first decorator line. On the other hand,
in code objects, the `co_firstlineno` points to the first decorator
line.
Assertion rewriting inserts some imports to code it rewrites. The
imports are inserted at the lineno of the first statement in the AST. In
turn, the code object compiled from the rewritten AST uses the lineno of
the first statement (which is the first inserted import).
This means that given a module like this,
```py
@foo
@bar
def baz(): pass
```
the lineno of the code object without assertion rewriting
(`--assertion=plain`) is 1, but with assertion rewriting it is 3.
And *this* causes some issues for the exception repr when e.g. the
decorator line is invalid and raises during collection. The code becomes
confused and crashes with
INTERNALERROR> File "_pytest/_code/code.py", line 638, in get_source
INTERNALERROR> lines.append(space_prefix + source.lines[line_index].strip())
INTERNALERROR> IndexError: list index out of range
Fix it by special casing decorators. Maybe there are other cases like
this but off hand I can't think of another Python construct where the
lineno of the item would be after its first line, and this is the only
such issue we have had reported.
Ran Benita
Hugo van Kemenade
Jakob van Santen
Anthony Sottile
Kamran Ahmad
Bruno Oliveira
Sorin Sbarnea
Florian Bruhin
Faris A Chugthai
Vipul Kumar
Thomas Grainger