Since pytest now requires Python>=3.7, we can use the stdlib attrs
clone, dataclasses, instead of the OG package.
attrs is still somewhat nicer than dataclasses and has some extra
functionality, but for pytest usage there's not really a justification
IMO to impose the extra dependency on users when a standard alternative
exists.
In the following
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., ids=[val])
the ID values are only allowed to be `str`, `float`, `int` or `bool`.
In the following
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., [val])
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., [pytest.param(..., id=val])
a different code path is used, which also allows `bytes`, `complex`,
`re.Pattern`, `Enum` and anything with a `__name__`.
In the interest of consistency, use the latter code path for all cases.
This commit only refactors, it does not change or add functionality yet. Public
API is retained. Reason or refactoring:
User provided parameter IDs (e.g. Metafunc.parametrize(ids=...)) had so far
only been used to calculate a unique test ID for each test invocation. That
test ID was a joined string where each parameter contributed some partial ID.
We're soon going to reuse functionality to generate parameter keys for
reorder_items and FixtureDef cache. We will be interested in the partial
IDs, and only if they originate from explicit user information. Refactoring
makes logic and data accessible for reuse, and increases cohesion in general.
* [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* manual fixes after configuration update
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu>
In ff8b7884e8 NOTSET was changed to a
singleton enum, which ended up unexpectedly triggering a code path in ID
generation which checks for `isinstance(Enum)`.
Add an explicit case for it, which is not too bad anyway.
This prevents referring to a generic type without filling in its generic
type parameters.
The FixtureDef typing might need some more refining in the future.
In Python, if module A defines a name `name`, and module B does `import
name from A`, then another module C can `import name from B`.
Sometimes it is intentional -- module B is meant to "reexport" `name`.
But sometimes it is just confusion/inconsistency on where `name` should
be imported from.
mypy has a flag `--no-implicit-reexport` which puts some order into
this. A name can only be imported from a module if
1. The module defines the name
2. The module's `__all__` includes the name
3. The module imports the name as `from ... import .. as name`.
This flag is included in mypy's `--strict` flag.
I like this flag, but I realize it is a bit controversial, and in
particular item 3 above is a bit unfriendly to contributors who don't
know about it. So I didn't intend to add it to pytest.
But while investigating issue 7589 I came upon mypy issue 8754 which
causes `--no-implicit-reexport` to leak into installed libraries and
causes some unexpected typing differences *in pytest* if the user uses
this flag.
Since the diff mostly makes sense, let's just conform to it.
Mypy currently is unable to handle assigning attributes on function:
https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/2087.
pytest uses this for the outcome exceptions -- `pytest.fail.Exception`,
`pytest.exit.Exception` etc, and this is the canonical name by which they
are referred.
Initially we started working around this with type: ignores, and later
by switching e.g. `pytest.fail.Exception` with the direct exception
`Failed`. But this causes a lot of churn and is not as nice. And I also
found that some code relies on it, in skipping.py:
def pytest_configure(config):
if config.option.runxfail:
# yay a hack
import pytest
old = pytest.xfail
config._cleanup.append(lambda: setattr(pytest, "xfail", old))
def nop(*args, **kwargs):
pass
nop.Exception = xfail.Exception
setattr(pytest, "xfail", nop)
...
So it seems better to support it. Use a hack to make it work. The rest
of the commit rolls back all of the workarounds we added up to now.
`pytest.raises.Exception` also exists, but it's not used much so I kept
it as-is for now.
Hopefully in the future mypy supports this and this ugliness can be
removed.
It currently fails with a TypeError, and was not updated since 2013 -
therefore it can be assumed that it is not important to support it.
```
____________________ ERROR collecting test_nested_marks.py _____________________
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/hooks.py:286: in __call__
return self._hookexec(self, self.get_hookimpls(), kwargs)
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:93: in _hookexec
return self._inner_hookexec(hook, methods, kwargs)
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:337: in traced_hookexec
return outcome.get_result()
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:335: in <lambda>
outcome = _Result.from_call(lambda: oldcall(hook, hook_impls, kwargs))
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:87: in <lambda>
firstresult=hook.spec.opts.get("firstresult") if hook.spec else False,
…/Vcs/pytest/src/_pytest/python.py:235: in pytest_pycollect_makeitem
res = list(collector._genfunctions(name, obj))
…/Vcs/pytest/src/_pytest/python.py:404: in _genfunctions
self.ihook.pytest_generate_tests.call_extra(methods, dict(metafunc=metafunc))
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/hooks.py:324: in call_extra
return self(**kwargs)
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/hooks.py:286: in __call__
return self._hookexec(self, self.get_hookimpls(), kwargs)
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:93: in _hookexec
return self._inner_hookexec(hook, methods, kwargs)
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:337: in traced_hookexec
return outcome.get_result()
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:335: in <lambda>
outcome = _Result.from_call(lambda: oldcall(hook, hook_impls, kwargs))
…/Vcs/pluggy/src/pluggy/manager.py:87: in <lambda>
firstresult=hook.spec.opts.get("firstresult") if hook.spec else False,
…/Vcs/pytest/src/_pytest/python.py:130: in pytest_generate_tests
metafunc.parametrize(*marker.args, **marker.kwargs)
…/Vcs/pytest/src/_pytest/python.py:965: in parametrize
function_definition=self.definition,
…/Vcs/pytest/src/_pytest/mark/structures.py:111: in _for_parametrize
if len(param.values) != len(argnames):
E TypeError: object of type 'MarkDecorator' has no len()
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 1 error during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
```
* Update setup.py requires and classifiers
* Drop Python 2.7 and 3.4 from CI
* Update docs dropping 2.7 and 3.4 support
* Fix mock imports and remove tests related to pypi's mock module
* Add py27 and 34 support docs to the sidebar
* Remove usage of six from tmpdir
* Remove six.PY* code blocks
* Remove sys.version_info related code
* Cleanup compat
* Remove obsolete safe_str
* Remove obsolete __unicode__ methods
* Remove compat.PY35 and compat.PY36: not really needed anymore
* Remove unused UNICODE_TYPES
* Remove Jython specific code
* Remove some Python 2 references from docs
Related to #5275
It doesn't seem to add much value (why would one execute tests
based on that marker?), plus using the docstring for that
encourages one to write a more descriptive message about the test
- I wrote a thing: https://github.com/asottile/dead
- wanted to try it out, there's lots of false positives and I didn't look
through all the things it pointed out but here's some