test_ok2/doc/en/unittest.rst

250 lines
9.2 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _`unittest.TestCase`:
.. _`unittest`:
unittest.TestCase Support
=========================
``pytest`` supports running Python ``unittest``-based tests out of the box.
It's meant for leveraging existing ``unittest``-based test suites
to use pytest as a test runner and also allow to incrementally adapt
the test suite to take full advantage of pytest's features.
To run an existing ``unittest``-style test suite using ``pytest``, type:
.. code-block:: bash
pytest tests
pytest will automatically collect ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses and
their ``test`` methods in ``test_*.py`` or ``*_test.py`` files.
Almost all ``unittest`` features are supported:
* ``@unittest.skip`` style decorators;
* ``setUp/tearDown``;
* ``setUpClass/tearDownClass``;
* ``setUpModule/tearDownModule``;
.. _`load_tests protocol`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#load-tests-protocol
.. _`subtests`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#distinguishing-test-iterations-using-subtests
Up to this point pytest does not have support for the following features:
* `load_tests protocol`_;
* `subtests`_;
Benefits out of the box
-----------------------
By running your test suite with pytest you can make use of several features,
in most cases without having to modify existing code:
* Obtain :ref:`more informative tracebacks <tbreportdemo>`;
* :ref:`stdout and stderr <captures>` capturing;
* :ref:`Test selection options <select-tests>` using ``-k`` and ``-m`` flags;
* :ref:`maxfail`;
* :ref:`--pdb <pdb-option>` command-line option for debugging on test failures
(see :ref:`note <pdb-unittest-note>` below);
* Distribute tests to multiple CPUs using the `pytest-xdist <https://pypi.org/project/pytest-xdist/>`_ plugin;
* Use :ref:`plain assert-statements <assert>` instead of ``self.assert*`` functions (`unittest2pytest
<https://pypi.org/project/unittest2pytest/>`__ is immensely helpful in this);
pytest features in ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses
---------------------------------------------------
The following pytest features work in ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses:
* :ref:`Marks <mark>`: :ref:`skip <skip>`, :ref:`skipif <skipif>`, :ref:`xfail <xfail>`;
* :ref:`Auto-use fixtures <mixing-fixtures>`;
The following pytest features **do not** work, and probably
never will due to different design philosophies:
* :ref:`Fixtures <fixture>` (except for ``autouse`` fixtures, see :ref:`below <mixing-fixtures>`);
* :ref:`Parametrization <parametrize>`;
* :ref:`Custom hooks <writing-plugins>`;
Third party plugins may or may not work well, depending on the plugin and the test suite.
.. _mixing-fixtures:
Mixing pytest fixtures into ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses using marks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running your unittest with ``pytest`` allows you to use its
:ref:`fixture mechanism <fixture>` with ``unittest.TestCase`` style
tests. Assuming you have at least skimmed the pytest fixture features,
let's jump-start into an example that integrates a pytest ``db_class``
fixture, setting up a class-cached database object, and then reference
it from a unittest-style test:
.. code-block:: python
# content of conftest.py
# we define a fixture function below and it will be "used" by
# referencing its name from tests
import pytest
@pytest.fixture(scope="class")
def db_class(request):
class DummyDB:
pass
# set a class attribute on the invoking test context
request.cls.db = DummyDB()
This defines a fixture function ``db_class`` which - if used - is
called once for each test class and which sets the class-level
``db`` attribute to a ``DummyDB`` instance. The fixture function
achieves this by receiving a special ``request`` object which gives
access to :ref:`the requesting test context <request-context>` such
as the ``cls`` attribute, denoting the class from which the fixture
is used. This architecture de-couples fixture writing from actual test
code and allows re-use of the fixture by a minimal reference, the fixture
name. So let's write an actual ``unittest.TestCase`` class using our
fixture definition:
.. code-block:: python
# content of test_unittest_db.py
import unittest
import pytest
@pytest.mark.usefixtures("db_class")
class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test_method1(self):
assert hasattr(self, "db")
assert 0, self.db # fail for demo purposes
def test_method2(self):
assert 0, self.db # fail for demo purposes
The ``@pytest.mark.usefixtures("db_class")`` class-decorator makes sure that
the pytest fixture function ``db_class`` is called once per class.
Due to the deliberately failing assert statements, we can take a look at
the ``self.db`` values in the traceback:
.. code-block:: pytest
$ pytest test_unittest_db.py
=========================== test session starts ============================
platform linux -- Python 3.x.y, pytest-5.x.y, py-1.x.y, pluggy-0.x.y
cachedir: $PYTHON_PREFIX/.pytest_cache
rootdir: $REGENDOC_TMPDIR
collected 2 items
test_unittest_db.py FF [100%]
================================= FAILURES =================================
___________________________ MyTest.test_method1 ____________________________
self = <test_unittest_db.MyTest testMethod=test_method1>
def test_method1(self):
assert hasattr(self, "db")
> assert 0, self.db # fail for demo purposes
E AssertionError: <conftest.db_class.<locals>.DummyDB object at 0xdeadbeef>
E assert 0
test_unittest_db.py:10: AssertionError
___________________________ MyTest.test_method2 ____________________________
self = <test_unittest_db.MyTest testMethod=test_method2>
def test_method2(self):
> assert 0, self.db # fail for demo purposes
E AssertionError: <conftest.db_class.<locals>.DummyDB object at 0xdeadbeef>
E assert 0
test_unittest_db.py:13: AssertionError
============================ 2 failed in 0.12s =============================
This default pytest traceback shows that the two test methods
share the same ``self.db`` instance which was our intention
when writing the class-scoped fixture function above.
Using autouse fixtures and accessing other fixtures
---------------------------------------------------
Although it's usually better to explicitly declare use of fixtures you need
for a given test, you may sometimes want to have fixtures that are
automatically used in a given context. After all, the traditional
style of unittest-setup mandates the use of this implicit fixture writing
and chances are, you are used to it or like it.
You can flag fixture functions with ``@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)``
and define the fixture function in the context where you want it used.
Let's look at an ``initdir`` fixture which makes all test methods of a
``TestCase`` class execute in a temporary directory with a
pre-initialized ``samplefile.ini``. Our ``initdir`` fixture itself uses
the pytest builtin :ref:`tmpdir <tmpdir>` fixture to delegate the
creation of a per-test temporary directory:
.. code-block:: python
# content of test_unittest_cleandir.py
import pytest
import unittest
class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def initdir(self, tmpdir):
tmpdir.chdir() # change to pytest-provided temporary directory
tmpdir.join("samplefile.ini").write("# testdata")
def test_method(self):
with open("samplefile.ini") as f:
s = f.read()
assert "testdata" in s
Due to the ``autouse`` flag the ``initdir`` fixture function will be
used for all methods of the class where it is defined. This is a
shortcut for using a ``@pytest.mark.usefixtures("initdir")`` marker
on the class like in the previous example.
Running this test module ...:
.. code-block:: pytest
$ pytest -q test_unittest_cleandir.py
. [100%]
1 passed in 0.12s
... gives us one passed test because the ``initdir`` fixture function
was executed ahead of the ``test_method``.
.. note::
``unittest.TestCase`` methods cannot directly receive fixture
arguments as implementing that is likely to inflict
on the ability to run general unittest.TestCase test suites.
The above ``usefixtures`` and ``autouse`` examples should help to mix in
pytest fixtures into unittest suites.
You can also gradually move away from subclassing from ``unittest.TestCase`` to *plain asserts*
and then start to benefit from the full pytest feature set step by step.
.. _pdb-unittest-note:
.. note::
Due to architectural differences between the two frameworks, setup and
teardown for ``unittest``-based tests is performed during the ``call`` phase
of testing instead of in ``pytest``'s standard ``setup`` and ``teardown``
stages. This can be important to understand in some situations, particularly
when reasoning about errors. For example, if a ``unittest``-based suite
exhibits errors during setup, ``pytest`` will report no errors during its
``setup`` phase and will instead raise the error during ``call``.