django/tests/migrations/test_executor.py

498 lines
20 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

2013-05-31 01:08:58 +08:00
from django.db import connection
from django.db.migrations.executor import MigrationExecutor
from django.db.migrations.graph import MigrationGraph
from django.test import modify_settings, override_settings, TestCase
from django.apps.registry import apps as global_apps
from .test_base import MigrationTestBase
2013-05-31 01:08:58 +08:00
@modify_settings(INSTALLED_APPS={'append': 'migrations2'})
class ExecutorTests(MigrationTestBase):
2013-05-31 01:08:58 +08:00
"""
Tests the migration executor (full end-to-end running).
Bear in mind that if these are failing you should fix the other
test failures first, as they may be propagating into here.
"""
available_apps = ["migrations", "migrations2", "django.contrib.auth", "django.contrib.contenttypes"]
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
2013-05-31 01:08:58 +08:00
def test_run(self):
"""
Tests running a simple set of migrations.
"""
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
# Let's look at the plan first and make sure it's up to scratch
plan = executor.migration_plan([("migrations", "0002_second")])
self.assertEqual(
plan,
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_initial"], False),
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0002_second"], False),
],
)
# Were the tables there before?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_book")
2013-05-31 01:08:58 +08:00
# Alright, let's try running it
executor.migrate([("migrations", "0002_second")])
# Are the tables there now?
self.assertTableExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableExists("migrations_book")
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
2013-08-23 19:07:43 +08:00
# Alright, let's undo what we did
plan = executor.migration_plan([("migrations", None)])
self.assertEqual(
plan,
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0002_second"], True),
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_initial"], True),
],
)
executor.migrate([("migrations", None)])
# Are the tables gone?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_book")
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_squashed"})
def test_run_with_squashed(self):
"""
Tests running a squashed migration from zero (should ignore what it replaces)
"""
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
# Check our leaf node is the squashed one
leaves = [key for key in executor.loader.graph.leaf_nodes() if key[0] == "migrations"]
self.assertEqual(leaves, [("migrations", "0001_squashed_0002")])
# Check the plan
plan = executor.migration_plan([("migrations", "0001_squashed_0002")])
self.assertEqual(
plan,
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_squashed_0002"], False),
],
)
# Were the tables there before?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_book")
# Alright, let's try running it
executor.migrate([("migrations", "0001_squashed_0002")])
# Are the tables there now?
self.assertTableExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableExists("migrations_book")
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
# Alright, let's undo what we did. Should also just use squashed.
plan = executor.migration_plan([("migrations", None)])
self.assertEqual(
plan,
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_squashed_0002"], True),
],
)
2013-08-23 19:07:43 +08:00
executor.migrate([("migrations", None)])
# Are the tables gone?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_book")
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={
"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations",
"migrations2": "migrations2.test_migrations_2",
})
def test_empty_plan(self):
"""
Tests that re-planning a full migration of a fully-migrated set doesn't
perform spurious unmigrations and remigrations.
There was previously a bug where the executor just always performed the
backwards plan for applied migrations - which even for the most recent
migration in an app, might include other, dependent apps, and these
were being unmigrated.
"""
# Make the initial plan, check it
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
plan = executor.migration_plan([
("migrations", "0002_second"),
("migrations2", "0001_initial"),
])
self.assertEqual(
plan,
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_initial"], False),
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0002_second"], False),
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations2", "0001_initial"], False),
],
)
# Fake-apply all migrations
executor.migrate([
("migrations", "0002_second"),
("migrations2", "0001_initial")
], fake=True)
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
# Now plan a second time and make sure it's empty
plan = executor.migration_plan([
("migrations", "0002_second"),
("migrations2", "0001_initial"),
])
self.assertEqual(plan, [])
# Erase all the fake records
executor.recorder.record_unapplied("migrations2", "0001_initial")
executor.recorder.record_unapplied("migrations", "0002_second")
executor.recorder.record_unapplied("migrations", "0001_initial")
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
def test_soft_apply(self):
"""
Tests detection of initial migrations already having been applied.
"""
state = {"faked": None}
2013-10-31 01:42:35 +08:00
def fake_storer(phase, migration=None, fake=None):
state["faked"] = fake
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection, progress_callback=fake_storer)
# Were the tables there before?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
# Run it normally
self.assertEqual(
executor.migration_plan([("migrations", "0001_initial")]),
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_initial"], False),
],
)
executor.migrate([("migrations", "0001_initial")])
# Are the tables there now?
self.assertTableExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableExists("migrations_tribble")
# We shouldn't have faked that one
self.assertEqual(state["faked"], False)
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
# Fake-reverse that
executor.migrate([("migrations", None)], fake=True)
# Are the tables still there?
self.assertTableExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableExists("migrations_tribble")
# Make sure that was faked
self.assertEqual(state["faked"], True)
# Finally, migrate forwards; this should fake-apply our initial migration
executor.loader.build_graph()
self.assertEqual(
executor.migration_plan([("migrations", "0001_initial")]),
[
(executor.loader.graph.nodes["migrations", "0001_initial"], False),
],
)
executor.migrate([("migrations", "0001_initial")])
self.assertEqual(state["faked"], True)
# And migrate back to clean up the database
executor.loader.build_graph()
executor.migrate([("migrations", None)])
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
2014-05-09 12:48:10 +08:00
@override_settings(
MIGRATION_MODULES={
"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_custom_user",
"django.contrib.auth": "django.contrib.auth.migrations",
},
2014-05-09 12:48:10 +08:00
AUTH_USER_MODEL="migrations.Author",
)
def test_custom_user(self):
"""
Regression test for #22325 - references to a custom user model defined in the
same app are not resolved correctly.
"""
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
# Migrate forwards
executor.migrate([("migrations", "0001_initial")])
self.assertTableExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableExists("migrations_tribble")
# Make sure the soft-application detection works (#23093)
# Change table_names to not return auth_user during this as
# it wouldn't be there in a normal run, and ensure migrations.Author
# exists in the global app registry temporarily.
old_table_names = connection.introspection.table_names
connection.introspection.table_names = lambda c: [x for x in old_table_names(c) if x != "auth_user"]
migrations_apps = executor.loader.project_state(("migrations", "0001_initial")).apps
global_apps.get_app_config("migrations").models["author"] = migrations_apps.get_model("migrations", "author")
try:
migration = executor.loader.get_migration("auth", "0001_initial")
self.assertEqual(executor.detect_soft_applied(None, migration)[0], True)
finally:
connection.introspection.table_names = old_table_names
del global_apps.get_app_config("migrations").models["author"]
2014-05-09 12:48:10 +08:00
# And migrate back to clean up the database
executor.loader.build_graph()
executor.migrate([("migrations", None)])
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
@override_settings(
INSTALLED_APPS=[
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_a",
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_b",
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_c"
]
)
def test_unrelated_model_lookups_forwards(self):
"""
#24123 - Tests that all models of apps already applied which are
unrelated to the first app being applied are part of the initial model
state.
"""
try:
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_a_a1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_b_b1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_c_c1")
executor.migrate([("lookuperror_b", "0003_b3")])
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_b_b3")
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
# Migrate forwards -- This led to a lookup LookupErrors because
# lookuperror_b.B2 is already applied
executor.migrate([
("lookuperror_a", "0004_a4"),
("lookuperror_c", "0003_c3"),
])
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_a_a4")
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_c_c3")
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
finally:
# Cleanup
executor.migrate([
("lookuperror_a", None),
("lookuperror_b", None),
("lookuperror_c", None),
])
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_a_a1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_b_b1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_c_c1")
@override_settings(
INSTALLED_APPS=[
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_a",
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_b",
"migrations.migrations_test_apps.lookuperror_c"
]
)
def test_unrelated_model_lookups_backwards(self):
"""
#24123 - Tests that all models of apps being unapplied which are
unrelated to the first app being unapplied are part of the initial
model state.
"""
try:
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection)
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_a_a1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_b_b1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_c_c1")
executor.migrate([
("lookuperror_a", "0004_a4"),
("lookuperror_b", "0003_b3"),
("lookuperror_c", "0003_c3"),
])
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_b_b3")
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_a_a4")
self.assertTableExists("lookuperror_c_c3")
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
# Migrate backwards -- This led to a lookup LookupErrors because
# lookuperror_b.B2 is not in the initial state (unrelated to app c)
executor.migrate([("lookuperror_a", None)])
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
finally:
# Cleanup
executor.migrate([
("lookuperror_b", None),
("lookuperror_c", None)
])
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_a_a1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_b_b1")
self.assertTableNotExists("lookuperror_c_c1")
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
def test_process_callback(self):
"""
#24129 - Tests callback process
"""
call_args_list = []
def callback(*args):
call_args_list.append(args)
executor = MigrationExecutor(connection, progress_callback=callback)
# Were the tables there before?
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
executor.migrate([
("migrations", "0001_initial"),
("migrations", "0002_second"),
])
# Rebuild the graph to reflect the new DB state
executor.loader.build_graph()
executor.migrate([
("migrations", None),
("migrations", None),
])
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_author")
self.assertTableNotExists("migrations_tribble")
migrations = executor.loader.graph.nodes
expected = [
("render_start", ),
("render_success", ),
("apply_start", migrations['migrations', '0001_initial'], False),
("apply_success", migrations['migrations', '0001_initial'], False),
("apply_start", migrations['migrations', '0002_second'], False),
("apply_success", migrations['migrations', '0002_second'], False),
("render_start", ),
("render_success", ),
("unapply_start", migrations['migrations', '0002_second'], False),
("unapply_success", migrations['migrations', '0002_second'], False),
("unapply_start", migrations['migrations', '0001_initial'], False),
("unapply_success", migrations['migrations', '0001_initial'], False),
]
self.assertEqual(call_args_list, expected)
class FakeLoader(object):
def __init__(self, graph, applied):
self.graph = graph
self.applied_migrations = applied
class FakeMigration(object):
"""Really all we need is any object with a debug-useful repr."""
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
def __repr__(self):
return 'M<%s>' % self.name
class ExecutorUnitTests(TestCase):
"""(More) isolated unit tests for executor methods."""
def test_minimize_rollbacks(self):
"""
Minimize unnecessary rollbacks in connected apps.
When you say "./manage.py migrate appA 0001", rather than migrating to
just after appA-0001 in the linearized migration plan (which could roll
back migrations in other apps that depend on appA 0001, but don't need
to be rolled back since we're not rolling back appA 0001), we migrate
to just before appA-0002.
"""
a1_impl = FakeMigration('a1')
a1 = ('a', '1')
a2_impl = FakeMigration('a2')
a2 = ('a', '2')
b1_impl = FakeMigration('b1')
b1 = ('b', '1')
graph = MigrationGraph()
graph.add_node(a1, a1_impl)
graph.add_node(a2, a2_impl)
graph.add_node(b1, b1_impl)
graph.add_dependency(None, b1, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, a2, a1)
executor = MigrationExecutor(None)
executor.loader = FakeLoader(graph, {a1, b1, a2})
plan = executor.migration_plan({a1})
self.assertEqual(plan, [(a2_impl, True)])
def test_minimize_rollbacks_branchy(self):
"""
Minimize rollbacks when target has multiple in-app children.
a: 1 <---- 3 <--\
\ \- 2 <--- 4
\ \
b: \- 1 <--- 2
"""
a1_impl = FakeMigration('a1')
a1 = ('a', '1')
a2_impl = FakeMigration('a2')
a2 = ('a', '2')
a3_impl = FakeMigration('a3')
a3 = ('a', '3')
a4_impl = FakeMigration('a4')
a4 = ('a', '4')
b1_impl = FakeMigration('b1')
b1 = ('b', '1')
b2_impl = FakeMigration('b2')
b2 = ('b', '2')
graph = MigrationGraph()
graph.add_node(a1, a1_impl)
graph.add_node(a2, a2_impl)
graph.add_node(a3, a3_impl)
graph.add_node(a4, a4_impl)
graph.add_node(b1, b1_impl)
graph.add_node(b2, b2_impl)
graph.add_dependency(None, a2, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, a3, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, a4, a2)
graph.add_dependency(None, a4, a3)
graph.add_dependency(None, b2, b1)
graph.add_dependency(None, b1, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, b2, a2)
executor = MigrationExecutor(None)
executor.loader = FakeLoader(graph, {a1, b1, a2, b2, a3, a4})
plan = executor.migration_plan({a1})
should_be_rolled_back = [b2_impl, a4_impl, a2_impl, a3_impl]
exp = [(m, True) for m in should_be_rolled_back]
self.assertEqual(plan, exp)
def test_backwards_nothing_to_do(self):
"""
If the current state satisfies the given target, do nothing.
a: 1 <--- 2
b: \- 1
c: \- 1
If a1 is applied already and a2 is not, and we're asked to migrate to
a1, don't apply or unapply b1 or c1, regardless of their current state.
"""
a1_impl = FakeMigration('a1')
a1 = ('a', '1')
a2_impl = FakeMigration('a2')
a2 = ('a', '2')
b1_impl = FakeMigration('b1')
b1 = ('b', '1')
c1_impl = FakeMigration('c1')
c1 = ('c', '1')
graph = MigrationGraph()
graph.add_node(a1, a1_impl)
graph.add_node(a2, a2_impl)
graph.add_node(b1, b1_impl)
graph.add_node(c1, c1_impl)
graph.add_dependency(None, a2, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, b1, a1)
graph.add_dependency(None, c1, a1)
executor = MigrationExecutor(None)
executor.loader = FakeLoader(graph, {a1, b1})
plan = executor.migration_plan({a1})
self.assertEqual(plan, [])