2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
.. _topics-db-sql:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
==========================
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
Performing raw SQL queries
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
.. currentmodule:: django.db.models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the :ref:`model query APIs <topics-db-queries>` don't go far enough, you
|
|
|
|
can fall back to writing raw SQL. Django gives you two ways of performing raw
|
|
|
|
SQL queries: you can use :meth:`Manager.raw()` to `perform raw queries and
|
|
|
|
return model instances`__, or you can avoid the model layer entirely and
|
|
|
|
`execute custom SQL directly`__.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__ `performing raw queries`_
|
|
|
|
__ `executing custom SQL directly`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing raw queries
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``raw()`` manager method can be used to perform raw SQL queries that
|
|
|
|
return model instances:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-22 23:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
.. method:: Manager.raw(raw_query, params=None, translations=None)
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This method method takes a raw SQL query, executes it, and returns model
|
|
|
|
instances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is best illustrated with an example. Suppose you've got the following model::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(...)
|
|
|
|
last_name = models.CharField(...)
|
|
|
|
birth_date = models.DateField(...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You could then execute custom SQL like so::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT * from myapp_person')
|
|
|
|
[<Person: John Doe>, <Person: Jane Doe>, ...]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Model table names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where'd the name of the ``Person`` table come from in that example?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, Django figures out a database table name by joining the
|
|
|
|
model's "app label" -- the name you used in ``manage.py startapp`` -- to
|
|
|
|
the model's class name, with an underscore between them. In the example
|
|
|
|
we've assumed that the ``Person`` model lives in an app named ``myapp``,
|
|
|
|
so its table would be ``myapp_person``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more details check out the documentation for the
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Options.db_table` option, which also lets you manually set the
|
|
|
|
database table name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, this example isn't very exciting -- it's exactly the same as
|
|
|
|
running ``Person.objects.all()``. However, ``raw()`` has a bunch of other
|
|
|
|
options that make it very powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapping query fields to model fields
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``raw()`` automatically maps fields in the query to fields on the model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The order of fields in your query doesn't matter. In other words, both
|
|
|
|
of the following queries work identically::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT id, first_name, last_name, birth_date FROM myapp_person')
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT last_name, birth_date, first_name, id FROM myapp_person')
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching is done by name. This means that you can use SQL's ``AS`` clauses to
|
|
|
|
map fields in the query to model fields. So if you had some other table that
|
|
|
|
had ``Person`` data in it, you could easily map it into ``Person`` instances::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('''SELECT first AS first_name,
|
|
|
|
... last AS last_name,
|
|
|
|
... bd AS birth_date,
|
|
|
|
... pk as id,
|
|
|
|
... FROM some_other_table)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As long as the names match, the model instances will be created correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can map fields in the query to model fields using the
|
|
|
|
``translations`` argument to ``raw()``. This is a dictionary mapping names of
|
|
|
|
fields in the query to names of fields on the model. For example, the above
|
|
|
|
query could also be written::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> name_map = {'first': 'first_name', 'last': 'last_name', 'bd': 'birth_date', 'pk': 'id'}
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT * FROM some_other_table', translations=name_map)
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-23 13:22:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Index lookups
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``raw()`` supports indexing, so if you need only the first result you can
|
|
|
|
write::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> first_person = Person.objects.raw('SELECT * from myapp_person')[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, the indexing and slicing are not performed at the database level. If
|
2010-02-23 14:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
you have a big amount of ``Person`` objects in your database, it is more
|
2010-02-23 13:22:12 +08:00
|
|
|
efficient to limit the query at the SQL level::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> first_person = Person.objects.raw('SELECT * from myapp_person LIMIT 1')[0]
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
Deferring model fields
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fields may also be left out::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> people = Person.objects.raw('SELECT id, first_name FROM myapp_person'):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``Person`` objects returned by this query will be :ref:`deferred
|
|
|
|
<queryset-defer>` model instances. This means that the fields that are omitted
|
|
|
|
from the query will be loaded on demand. For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> for p in Person.objects.raw('SELECT id, first_name FROM myapp_person'):
|
|
|
|
... print p.first_name, # This will be retrieved by the original query
|
|
|
|
... print p.last_name # This will be retrieved on demand
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
John Smith
|
|
|
|
Jane Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From outward appearances, this looks like the query has retrieved both
|
|
|
|
the first name and last name. However, this example actually issued 3
|
|
|
|
queries. Only the first names were retrieved by the raw() query -- the
|
|
|
|
last names were both retrieved on demand when they were printed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is only one field that you can't leave out - the primary key
|
|
|
|
field. Django uses the primary key to identify model instances, so it
|
|
|
|
must always be included in a raw query. An ``InvalidQuery`` exception
|
|
|
|
will be raised if you forget to include the primary key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding annotations
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can also execute queries containing fields that aren't defined on the
|
|
|
|
model. For example, we could use `PostgreSQL's age() function`__ to get a list
|
|
|
|
of people with their ages calculated by the database::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> people = Person.objects.raw('SELECT *, age(birth_date) AS age FROM myapp_person')
|
|
|
|
>>> for p in people:
|
|
|
|
... print "%s is %s." % (p.first_name, p.age)
|
|
|
|
John is 37.
|
|
|
|
Jane is 42.
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__ http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/functions-datetime.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passing parameters into ``raw()``
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to perform parameterized queries, you can use the ``params``
|
|
|
|
argument to ``raw()``::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> lname = 'Doe'
|
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw('SELECT * FROM myapp_person WHERE last_name = %s', [lname])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``params`` is a list of parameters. You'll use ``%s`` placeholders in the
|
|
|
|
query string (regardless of your database engine); they'll be replaced with
|
|
|
|
parameters from the ``params`` list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Do not use string formatting on raw queries!**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's tempting to write the above query as::
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-21 09:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> query = 'SELECT * FROM myapp_person WHERE last_name = %s' % lname
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> Person.objects.raw(query)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Don't.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the ``params`` list completely protects you from `SQL injection
|
2009-12-21 09:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
attacks`__, a common exploit where attackers inject arbitrary SQL into
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
your database. If you use string interpolation, sooner or later you'll
|
|
|
|
fall victim to SQL injection. As long as you remember to always use the
|
|
|
|
``params`` list you'll be protected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL_injection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executing custom SQL directly
|
|
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes even :meth:`Manager.raw` isn't quite enough: you might need to
|
|
|
|
perform queries that don't map cleanly to models, or directly execute
|
|
|
|
``UPDATE``, ``INSERT``, or ``DELETE`` queries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In these cases, you can always access the database directly, routing around
|
|
|
|
the model layer entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The object ``django.db.connection`` represents the
|
2009-05-02 15:40:25 +08:00
|
|
|
current database connection, and ``django.db.transaction`` represents the
|
|
|
|
current database transaction. To use the database connection, call
|
|
|
|
``connection.cursor()`` to get a cursor object. Then, call
|
|
|
|
``cursor.execute(sql, [params])`` to execute the SQL and ``cursor.fetchone()``
|
|
|
|
or ``cursor.fetchall()`` to return the resulting rows. After performing a data
|
|
|
|
changing operation, you should then call
|
|
|
|
``transaction.commit_unless_managed()`` to ensure your changes are committed
|
|
|
|
to the database. If your query is purely a data retrieval operation, no commit
|
|
|
|
is required. For example::
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-20 10:46:58 +08:00
|
|
|
def my_custom_sql():
|
2009-05-02 15:40:25 +08:00
|
|
|
from django.db import connection, transaction
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
cursor = connection.cursor()
|
2009-05-02 15:40:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Data modifying operation - commit required
|
|
|
|
cursor.execute("UPDATE bar SET foo = 1 WHERE baz = %s", [self.baz])
|
|
|
|
transaction.commit_unless_managed()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Data retrieval operation - no commit required
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
cursor.execute("SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = %s", [self.baz])
|
|
|
|
row = cursor.fetchone()
|
2009-05-02 15:40:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
return row
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-17 21:47:39 +08:00
|
|
|
.. _transactions-and-raw-sql:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions and raw SQL
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you are using transaction decorators (such as ``commit_on_success``) to
|
|
|
|
wrap your views and provide transaction control, you don't have to make a
|
|
|
|
manual call to ``transaction.commit_unless_managed()`` -- you can manually
|
|
|
|
commit if you want to, but you aren't required to, since the decorator will
|
|
|
|
commit for you. However, if you don't manually commit your changes, you will
|
|
|
|
need to manually mark the transaction as dirty, using
|
|
|
|
``transaction.set_dirty()``::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@commit_on_success
|
|
|
|
def my_custom_sql_view(request, value):
|
|
|
|
from django.db import connection, transaction
|
|
|
|
cursor = connection.cursor()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Data modifying operation
|
|
|
|
cursor.execute("UPDATE bar SET foo = 1 WHERE baz = %s", [value])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Since we modified data, mark the transaction as dirty
|
|
|
|
transaction.set_dirty()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Data retrieval operation. This doesn't dirty the transaction,
|
|
|
|
# so no call to set_dirty() is required.
|
|
|
|
cursor.execute("SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = %s", [value])
|
|
|
|
row = cursor.fetchone()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return render_to_response('template.html', {'row': row})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The call to ``set_dirty()`` is made automatically when you use the Django ORM
|
|
|
|
to make data modifying database calls. However, when you use raw SQL, Django
|
|
|
|
has no way of knowing if your SQL modifies data or not. The manual call to
|
|
|
|
``set_dirty()`` ensures that Django knows that there are modifications that
|
|
|
|
must be committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connections and cursors
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2008-08-24 06:25:40 +08:00
|
|
|
``connection`` and ``cursor`` mostly implement the standard `Python DB-API`_
|
|
|
|
(except when it comes to :ref:`transaction handling <topics-db-transactions>`).
|
|
|
|
If you're not familiar with the Python DB-API, note that the SQL statement in
|
|
|
|
``cursor.execute()`` uses placeholders, ``"%s"``, rather than adding parameters
|
|
|
|
directly within the SQL. If you use this technique, the underlying database
|
|
|
|
library will automatically add quotes and escaping to your parameter(s) as
|
|
|
|
necessary. (Also note that Django expects the ``"%s"`` placeholder, *not* the
|
|
|
|
``"?"`` placeholder, which is used by the SQLite Python bindings. This is for
|
|
|
|
the sake of consistency and sanity.)
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-26 14:37:26 +08:00
|
|
|
.. _Python DB-API: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/
|