Refs #10113 -- Modified the generated SQL to remove redundant GROUP BY elements, and modified the test added in [9788] to remove a test result that depended on a potentially ambiguous database ordering.

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9791 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
Russell Keith-Magee 2009-01-24 14:16:25 +00:00
parent ff78aef93b
commit 08dd4176ed
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -385,7 +385,8 @@ class BaseQuery(object):
# other than MySQL), then any fields mentioned in the
# ordering clause needs to be in the group by clause.
if not self.connection.features.allows_group_by_pk:
grouping.extend(ordering_group_by)
grouping.extend([col for col in ordering_group_by
if col not in grouping])
else:
ordering = self.connection.ops.force_no_ordering()
result.append('GROUP BY %s' % ', '.join(grouping))

View File

@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'foo' into field. Choices are: authors, id, i
# Regression for #10113 - Fields mentioned in order_by() must be included in the GROUP BY.
# This only becomes a problem when the order_by introduces a new join.
>>> Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count('authors')).order_by('publisher__name')
[<Book: The Definitive Guide to Django: Web Development Done Right>, <Book: Practical Django Projects>, <Book: Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common Lisp>, <Book: Python Web Development with Django>, <Book: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach>, <Book: Sams Teach Yourself Django in 24 Hours>]
>>> Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count('authors')).order_by('publisher__name', 'name')
[<Book: Practical Django Projects>, <Book: The Definitive Guide to Django: Web Development Done Right>, <Book: Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common Lisp>, <Book: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach>, <Book: Python Web Development with Django>, <Book: Sams Teach Yourself Django in 24 Hours>]
"""
}