Fixed bug in has_related_links=True, which is legacy and shouldn't be used by anybody

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@601 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Holovaty 2005-09-02 16:34:14 +00:00
parent 582e6a1010
commit 324f717c5e
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -299,18 +299,19 @@ class Options:
rel_objs.append((klass._meta, f))
if self.has_related_links:
# Manually add RelatedLink objects, which are a special case.
core = get_module('relatedlinks', 'relatedlinks')
relatedlinks = get_module('relatedlinks', 'relatedlinks')
# Note that the copy() is very important -- otherwise any
# subsequently loaded object with related links will override this
# relationship we're adding.
link_field = copy.copy(core.RelatedLink._meta.get_field('object_id'))
link_field = copy.copy(relatedlinks.RelatedLink._meta.get_field('object_id'))
link_field.rel = ManyToOne(self.get_model_module().Klass, 'id',
num_in_admin=3, min_num_in_admin=3, edit_inline=TABULAR,
lookup_overrides={
'content_type__package__label__exact': self.app_label,
'content_type__python_module_name__exact': self.module_name
'content_type__python_module_name__exact': self.module_name,
'object_id__id__exact': None,
})
rel_objs.append((core.RelatedLink._meta, link_field))
rel_objs.append((relatedlinks.RelatedLink._meta, link_field))
self._all_related_objects = rel_objs
return rel_objs
@ -1532,7 +1533,7 @@ def manipulator_save(opts, klass, add, change, self, new_data):
else:
params[f.column] = f.get_manipulator_new_data(rel_new_data, rel=True)
# Related links are a special case, because we have to
# manually set the "content_type_id" field.
# manually set the "content_type_id" and "object_id" fields.
if opts.has_related_links and rel_opts.module_name == 'relatedlinks':
contenttypes_mod = get_module('core', 'contenttypes')
params['content_type_id'] = contenttypes_mod.get_object(package__label__exact=opts.app_label, python_module_name__exact=opts.module_name).id