test0908
/
django
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #1128 from erikr/improve-smallint-docs 

Fixed #20446 -- Documentation for SmallIntegerField does not clarify 'small'
This commit is contained in:
Tim Graham 2013-05-18 08:28:20 -07:00
parent 96cabba808 56e2f6ccae
commit 78de9b1902
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/ref/models/fields.txt
View File

@ -889,7 +889,8 @@ The value ``0`` is accepted for backward compatibility reasons.
.. class:: PositiveSmallIntegerField([**options])
Like a :class:`PositiveIntegerField`, but only allows values under a certain
(database-dependent) point.
(database-dependent) point. Values up to 32767 are safe in all databases
supported by Django.
``SlugField``
-------------
@ -917,7 +918,8 @@ of some other value. You can do this automatically in the admin using
.. class:: SmallIntegerField([**options])
Like an :class:`IntegerField`, but only allows values under a certain
(database-dependent) point.
(database-dependent) point. Values from -32768 to 32767 are safe in all databases
supported by Django.
``TextField``
-------------