Removed British/Austrialian word: whilist.
This commit is contained in:
parent
16411b8400
commit
98839e9066
|
@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ class SessionBase(object):
|
|||
|
||||
def cycle_key(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Creates a new session key, whilst retaining the current session data.
|
||||
Creates a new session key, while retaining the current session data.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
data = self._session_cache
|
||||
key = self.session_key
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ def condition(etag_func=None, last_modified_func=None):
|
|||
The parameters are callables to compute the ETag and last modified time for
|
||||
the requested resource, respectively. The callables are passed the same
|
||||
parameters as the view itself. The Etag function should return a string (or
|
||||
None if the resource doesn't exist), whilst the last_modified function
|
||||
None if the resource doesn't exist), while the last_modified function
|
||||
should return a datetime object (or None if the resource doesn't exist).
|
||||
|
||||
If both parameters are provided, all the preconditions must be met before
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Comparison with middleware conditional processing
|
|||
You may notice that Django already provides simple and straightforward
|
||||
conditional ``GET`` handling via the
|
||||
:class:`django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware` and
|
||||
:class:`~django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware`. Whilst certainly being
|
||||
:class:`~django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware`. While certainly being
|
||||
easy to use and suitable for many situations, those pieces of middleware
|
||||
functionality have limitations for advanced usage:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ model, since it is an abstract base class. It does not generate a database
|
|||
table or have a manager, and cannot be instantiated or saved directly.
|
||||
|
||||
For many uses, this type of model inheritance will be exactly what you want.
|
||||
It provides a way to factor out common information at the Python level, whilst
|
||||
It provides a way to factor out common information at the Python level, while
|
||||
still only creating one database table per child model at the database level.
|
||||
|
||||
``Meta`` inheritance
|
||||
|
@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ Along with another app ``rare/models.py``::
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
The reverse name of the ``common.ChildA.m2m`` field will be
|
||||
``common_childa_related``, whilst the reverse name of the
|
||||
``common_childa_related``, while the reverse name of the
|
||||
``common.ChildB.m2m`` field will be ``common_childb_related``, and finally the
|
||||
reverse name of the ``rare.ChildB.m2m`` field will be ``rare_childb_related``.
|
||||
It is up to you how you use the ``'%(class)s'`` and ``'%(app_label)s`` portion
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ Handling exceptions within PostgreSQL transactions
|
|||
Inside a transaction, when a call to a PostgreSQL cursor raises an exception
|
||||
(typically ``IntegrityError``), all subsequent SQL in the same transaction
|
||||
will fail with the error "current transaction is aborted, queries ignored
|
||||
until end of transaction block". Whilst simple use of ``save()`` is unlikely
|
||||
until end of transaction block". While simple use of ``save()`` is unlikely
|
||||
to raise an exception in PostgreSQL, there are more advanced usage patterns
|
||||
which might, such as saving objects with unique fields, saving using the
|
||||
force_insert/force_update flag, or invoking custom SQL.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ class SimpleTests(TestCase):
|
|||
"""
|
||||
The main test here is that the all the models can be created without
|
||||
any database errors. We can also do some more simple insertion and
|
||||
lookup tests whilst we're here to show that the second of models do
|
||||
lookup tests while we're here to show that the second of models do
|
||||
refer to the tables from the first set.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Insert some data into one set of models.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue