Fixed #12837 -- Clarified the naming strategy for m2m intermediate tables. Thanks to Ramiro Morales for the report and patch.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@12516 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
c306b78150
commit
a555df4c06
|
@ -913,12 +913,13 @@ the model is related. This works exactly the same as it does for
|
|||
Database Representation
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Behind the scenes, Django creates an intermediary join table to represent the
|
||||
many-to-many relationship. By default, this table name is generated using the
|
||||
names of the two tables being joined. Since some databases don't support table
|
||||
names above a certain length, these table names will be automatically
|
||||
truncated to 64 characters and a uniqueness hash will be used. This means you
|
||||
might see table names like ``author_books_9cdf4``; this is perfectly normal.
|
||||
Behind the scenes, Django creates an intermediary join table to
|
||||
represent the many-to-many relationship. By default, this table name
|
||||
is generated using the name of the many-to-many field and the model
|
||||
that contains it. Since some databases don't support table names above
|
||||
a certain length, these table names will be automatically truncated to
|
||||
64 characters and a uniqueness hash will be used. This means you might
|
||||
see table names like ``author_books_9cdf4``; this is perfectly normal.
|
||||
You can manually provide the name of the join table using the
|
||||
:attr:`~ManyToManyField.db_table` option.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue