Fixed #10035 -- Corrected more typos in the aggregation docs. Thanks to Ivan Sagalaev for his eagle eyes.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9753 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
d55b361ac4
commit
bf710bd005
|
@ -268,14 +268,14 @@ the annotation is computed over all members of the group.
|
|||
For example, consider an author query that attempts to find out the average
|
||||
rating of books written by each author:
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg('book_rating'))
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg('book__rating'))
|
||||
|
||||
This will return one result for each author in the database, annotate with
|
||||
their average book rating.
|
||||
|
||||
However, the result will be slightly different if you use a ``values()`` clause::
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.values('name').annotate(average_rating=Avg('book_rating'))
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.values('name').annotate(average_rating=Avg('book__rating'))
|
||||
|
||||
In this example, the authors will be grouped by name, so you will only get
|
||||
an annotated result for each *unique* author name. This means if you have
|
||||
|
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ output.
|
|||
For example, if we reverse the order of the ``values()`` and ``annotate()``
|
||||
clause from our previous example::
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg('book_rating')).values('name')
|
||||
>>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg('book__rating')).values('name')
|
||||
|
||||
This will now yield one unique result for each author; however, only
|
||||
the author's name and the ``average_rating`` annotation will be returned
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue