From ca801b8c8f7022cd9334a89ac9ae03f586650234 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wrwrwr Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:54:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improved line breaking in runtests docs. --- docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests.txt | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests.txt b/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests.txt index 1e69ac259e..286fd36f9c 100644 --- a/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests.txt +++ b/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests.txt @@ -269,9 +269,10 @@ Tests that only fail in combination In case a test passes when run in isolation but fails within the whole suite, we have some tools to help analyze the problem. -The ``--bisect`` option of ``runtests.py`` will run the failing test while halving the test set it -is run together with on each iteration, often making it possible to identify a -small number of tests that may be related to the failure. +The ``--bisect`` option of ``runtests.py`` will run the failing test while +halving the test set it is run together with on each iteration, often making +it possible to identify a small number of tests that may be related to the +failure. For example, suppose that the failing test that works on its own is ``ModelTest.test_eq``, then using: