Added a related name to the ForeignKey in the abstract base class of the
comment models. You'll never need to use this name, but it will lead to invalid models if not present. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8803 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
e545058ba9
commit
cf7a078774
|
@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ class BaseCommentAbstractModel(models.Model):
|
|||
An abstract base class that any custom comment models probably should
|
||||
subclass.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Content-object field
|
||||
content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType)
|
||||
content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType,
|
||||
related_name="content_type_set_for_%(class)s")
|
||||
object_pk = models.TextField(_('object ID'))
|
||||
content_object = generic.GenericForeignKey(ct_field="content_type", fk_field="object_pk")
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue