Fixed #2769 -- Applied some ReST formatting fixes. Thanks, ramiro.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@3774 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
d296e5e565
commit
e947fb2111
1
AUTHORS
1
AUTHORS
|
@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ answer newbie questions, and generally made Django that much better:
|
||||||
Daniel Poelzleithner <http://poelzi.org/>
|
Daniel Poelzleithner <http://poelzi.org/>
|
||||||
J. Rademaker
|
J. Rademaker
|
||||||
Michael Radziej <mir@noris.de>
|
Michael Radziej <mir@noris.de>
|
||||||
|
ramiro
|
||||||
Brian Ray <http://brianray.chipy.org/>
|
Brian Ray <http://brianray.chipy.org/>
|
||||||
rhettg@gmail.com
|
rhettg@gmail.com
|
||||||
Oliver Rutherfurd <http://rutherfurd.net/>
|
Oliver Rutherfurd <http://rutherfurd.net/>
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ Many-to-many relationships
|
||||||
--------------------------
|
--------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Both ends of a many-to-many relationship get automatic API access to the other
|
Both ends of a many-to-many relationship get automatic API access to the other
|
||||||
end. The API works just as a "backward" one-to-many relationship. See _Backward
|
end. The API works just as a "backward" one-to-many relationship. See Backward_
|
||||||
above.
|
above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The only difference is in the attribute naming: The model that defines the
|
The only difference is in the attribute naming: The model that defines the
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ template::
|
||||||
{% endblock %}
|
{% endblock %}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Before we get back to the problems with these naive set of views, let's go over
|
Before we get back to the problems with these naive set of views, let's go over
|
||||||
some salient points of the above template::
|
some salient points of the above template:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Field "widgets" are handled for you: ``{{ form.field }}`` automatically
|
* Field "widgets" are handled for you: ``{{ form.field }}`` automatically
|
||||||
creates the "right" type of widget for the form, as you can see with the
|
creates the "right" type of widget for the form, as you can see with the
|
||||||
|
@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ some salient points of the above template::
|
||||||
If you must use tables, use tables. If you're a semantic purist, you can
|
If you must use tables, use tables. If you're a semantic purist, you can
|
||||||
probably find better HTML than in the above template.
|
probably find better HTML than in the above template.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* To avoid name conflicts, the ``id``s of form elements take the form
|
* To avoid name conflicts, the ``id`` values of form elements take the
|
||||||
"id_*fieldname*".
|
form "id_*fieldname*".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By creating a creation form we've solved problem number 3 above, but we still
|
By creating a creation form we've solved problem number 3 above, but we still
|
||||||
don't have any validation. Let's revise the validation issue by writing a new
|
don't have any validation. Let's revise the validation issue by writing a new
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue