Fixed #17673 -- Forbid field shadowing.
Thanks Anssi Kääriäinen for the suggestion.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5123c7291
commit
ee9fcb1672
|
@ -1055,8 +1055,12 @@ class Model(six.with_metaclass(ModelBase)):
|
|||
if not cls._meta.swapped:
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_fields(**kwargs))
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_m2m_through_same_relationship())
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_id_field())
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_column_name_clashes())
|
||||
clash_errors = cls._check_id_field() + cls._check_field_name_clashes()
|
||||
errors.extend(clash_errors)
|
||||
# If there are field name clashes, hide consequent column name
|
||||
# clashes.
|
||||
if not clash_errors:
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_column_name_clashes())
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_index_together())
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_unique_together())
|
||||
errors.extend(cls._check_ordering())
|
||||
|
@ -1175,6 +1179,61 @@ class Model(six.with_metaclass(ModelBase)):
|
|||
else:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def _check_field_name_clashes(cls):
|
||||
""" Ref #17673. """
|
||||
|
||||
errors = []
|
||||
used_fields = {} # name or attname -> field
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that multi-inheritance doesn't cause field name shadowing.
|
||||
for parent in cls._meta.parents:
|
||||
for f in parent._meta.local_fields:
|
||||
clash = used_fields.get(f.name) or used_fields.get(f.attname) or None
|
||||
if clash:
|
||||
errors.append(
|
||||
checks.Error(
|
||||
('The field "%s" from parent model '
|
||||
'%s clashes with the field "%s" '
|
||||
'from parent model %s.') % (
|
||||
clash.name, clash.model._meta,
|
||||
f.name, f.model._meta
|
||||
),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=cls,
|
||||
id='E053',
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
used_fields[f.name] = f
|
||||
used_fields[f.attname] = f
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that fields defined in the model don't clash with fields from
|
||||
# parents.
|
||||
for f in cls._meta.local_fields:
|
||||
clash = used_fields.get(f.name) or used_fields.get(f.attname) or None
|
||||
# Note that we may detect clash between user-defined non-unique
|
||||
# field "id" and automatically added unique field "id", both
|
||||
# defined at the same model. This special case is considered in
|
||||
# _check_id_field and here we ignore it.
|
||||
id_conflict = (f.name == "id" and
|
||||
clash and clash.name == "id" and clash.model == cls)
|
||||
if clash and not id_conflict:
|
||||
errors.append(
|
||||
checks.Error(
|
||||
('The field clashes with the field "%s" '
|
||||
'from model %s.') % (
|
||||
clash.name, clash.model._meta
|
||||
),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=f,
|
||||
id='E054',
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
used_fields[f.name] = f
|
||||
used_fields[f.attname] = f
|
||||
|
||||
return errors
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def _check_column_name_clashes(cls):
|
||||
# Store a list of column names which have already been used by other fields.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -191,8 +191,9 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
|
|||
return errors
|
||||
|
||||
def _check_field_name(self):
|
||||
""" Check if field name is valid (i. e. not ending with an underscore).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
""" Check if field name is valid, i.e. 1) does not end with an
|
||||
underscore, 2) does not contain "__" and 3) is not "pk". """
|
||||
|
||||
if self.name.endswith('_'):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
checks.Error(
|
||||
|
@ -202,6 +203,24 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
|
|||
id='E001',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
elif '__' in self.name:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
checks.Error(
|
||||
'Field names must not contain "__".',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=self,
|
||||
id='E052',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
elif self.name == 'pk':
|
||||
return [
|
||||
checks.Error(
|
||||
'Cannot use "pk" as a field name since it is a reserved name.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=self,
|
||||
id='E051',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1068,6 +1068,12 @@ Miscellaneous
|
|||
which does allow primary keys with value 0. It only forbids *autoincrement*
|
||||
primary keys with value 0.
|
||||
|
||||
* Shadowing model fields defined in a parent model has been forbidden as this
|
||||
creates amiguity in the expected model behavior. In addition, any clashing
|
||||
fields in the model inheritance hierarchy results in a system check error.
|
||||
For example, if you use multi-inheritance, you need to define custom primary
|
||||
key fields on parent models, otherwise the default ``id`` fields will clash.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _deprecated-features-1.7:
|
||||
|
||||
Features deprecated in 1.7
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -191,31 +191,9 @@ class UniqueTogetherTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class OtherModelTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
||||
class FieldNamesTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unique_primary_key(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
id = models.IntegerField(primary_key=False)
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('You cannot use "id" as a field name, because each model '
|
||||
'automatically gets an "id" field if none of the fields '
|
||||
'have primary_key=True.'),
|
||||
hint='Remove or rename "id" field or add primary_key=True to a field.',
|
||||
obj=Model,
|
||||
id='E005',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Field "id" has column name "id" that is already used.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Model,
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_field_names_ending_with_underscore(self):
|
||||
def test_ending_with_underscore(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
field_ = models.CharField(max_length=10)
|
||||
m2m_ = models.ManyToManyField('self')
|
||||
|
@ -237,6 +215,138 @@ class OtherModelTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
|||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_including_separator(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
some__field = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Field names must not contain "__".',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('some__field'),
|
||||
id='E052',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pk(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
pk = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
'Cannot use "pk" as a field name since it is a reserved name.',
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('pk'),
|
||||
id='E051',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ShadowingFieldsTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multiinheritance_clash(self):
|
||||
class Mother(models.Model):
|
||||
clash = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
class Father(models.Model):
|
||||
clash = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
class Child(Mother, Father):
|
||||
# Here we have two clashed: id (automatic field) and clash, because
|
||||
# both parents define these fields.
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Child.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('The field "id" from parent model '
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.mother clashes with the field "id" '
|
||||
'from parent model invalid_models_tests.father.'),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Child,
|
||||
id='E053',
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('The field "clash" from parent model '
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.mother clashes with the field "clash" '
|
||||
'from parent model invalid_models_tests.father.'),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Child,
|
||||
id='E053',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inheritance_clash(self):
|
||||
class Parent(models.Model):
|
||||
f_id = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
class Target(models.Model):
|
||||
# This field doesn't result in a clash.
|
||||
f_id = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
class Child(Parent):
|
||||
# This field clashes with parent "f_id" field.
|
||||
f = models.ForeignKey(Target)
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Child.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('The field clashes with the field "f_id" '
|
||||
'from model invalid_models_tests.parent.'),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Child._meta.get_field('f'),
|
||||
id='E054',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_id_clash(self):
|
||||
class Target(models.Model):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
fk = models.ForeignKey(Target)
|
||||
fk_id = models.IntegerField()
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('The field clashes with the field "fk" from model '
|
||||
'invalid_models_tests.model.'),
|
||||
hint=None,
|
||||
obj=Model._meta.get_field('fk_id'),
|
||||
id='E054',
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class OtherModelTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unique_primary_key(self):
|
||||
invalid_id = models.IntegerField(primary_key=False)
|
||||
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
id = invalid_id
|
||||
|
||||
errors = Model.check()
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
Error(
|
||||
('You cannot use "id" as a field name, because each model '
|
||||
'automatically gets an "id" field if none of the fields '
|
||||
'have primary_key=True.'),
|
||||
hint='Remove or rename "id" field or add primary_key=True to a field.',
|
||||
obj=Model,
|
||||
id='E005',
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ordering_non_iterable(self):
|
||||
class Model(models.Model):
|
||||
class Meta:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -45,10 +45,6 @@ class Student(CommonInfo):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class StudentWorker(Student, Worker):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Abstract base classes with related models
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ from django.utils import six
|
|||
|
||||
from .models import (
|
||||
Chef, CommonInfo, ItalianRestaurant, ParkingLot, Place, Post,
|
||||
Restaurant, Student, StudentWorker, Supplier, Worker, MixinModel,
|
||||
Restaurant, Student, Supplier, Worker, MixinModel,
|
||||
Title, Base, SubBase)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -48,38 +48,6 @@ class ModelInheritanceTests(TestCase):
|
|||
# doesn't exist as a model).
|
||||
self.assertRaises(AttributeError, lambda: CommonInfo.objects.all())
|
||||
|
||||
# A StudentWorker which does not exist is both a Student and Worker
|
||||
# which does not exist.
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
Student.DoesNotExist,
|
||||
StudentWorker.objects.get, pk=12321321
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
Worker.DoesNotExist,
|
||||
StudentWorker.objects.get, pk=12321321
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# MultipleObjectsReturned is also inherited.
|
||||
# This is written out "long form", rather than using __init__/create()
|
||||
# because of a bug with diamond inheritance (#10808)
|
||||
sw1 = StudentWorker()
|
||||
sw1.name = "Wilma"
|
||||
sw1.age = 35
|
||||
sw1.save()
|
||||
sw2 = StudentWorker()
|
||||
sw2.name = "Betty"
|
||||
sw2.age = 24
|
||||
sw2.save()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
Student.MultipleObjectsReturned,
|
||||
StudentWorker.objects.get, pk__lt=sw2.pk + 100
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
Worker.MultipleObjectsReturned,
|
||||
StudentWorker.objects.get, pk__lt=sw2.pk + 100
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multiple_table(self):
|
||||
post = Post.objects.create(title="Lorem Ipsum")
|
||||
# The Post model has distinct accessors for the Comment and Link models.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue