Fixed #22862 -- Added --noinput option to makemigrations.
Thanks artortenburger for the report.
This commit is contained in:
parent
608aa8d101
commit
fbb684d95e
|
@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
|
|||
help="Enable fixing of migration conflicts.")
|
||||
parser.add_argument('--empty', action='store_true', dest='empty', default=False,
|
||||
help="Create an empty migration.")
|
||||
parser.add_argument('--noinput', action='store_false', dest='interactive', default=True,
|
||||
help='Tells Django to NOT prompt the user for input of any kind.')
|
||||
|
||||
def handle(self, *app_labels, **options):
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
|
|||
if self.interactive:
|
||||
questioner = InteractiveMigrationQuestioner()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
questioner = MigrationQuestioner()
|
||||
questioner = MigrationQuestioner(defaults={'ask_merge': True})
|
||||
for app_label, migration_names in conflicts.items():
|
||||
# Grab out the migrations in question, and work out their
|
||||
# common ancestor.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ Providing one or more app names as arguments will limit the migrations created
|
|||
to the app(s) specified and any dependencies needed (the table at the other end
|
||||
of a ``ForeignKey``, for example).
|
||||
|
||||
The :djadminopt:`--noinput` option may be provided to suppress all user prompts.
|
||||
|
||||
.. django-admin-option:: --empty
|
||||
|
||||
The ``--empty`` option will cause ``makemigrations`` to output an empty
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -231,19 +231,6 @@ class MakeMigrationsTests(MigrationTestBase):
|
|||
with self.assertRaises(CommandError):
|
||||
call_command("makemigrations")
|
||||
|
||||
@override_system_checks([])
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_conflict"})
|
||||
def test_makemigrations_merge_basic(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Makes sure that makemigrations doesn't error if you ask for
|
||||
merge mode with a conflict present. Doesn't test writing of the merge
|
||||
file, as that requires temp directories.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
call_command("makemigrations", merge=True, verbosity=0)
|
||||
except CommandError:
|
||||
self.fail("Makemigrations errored in merge mode with conflicts")
|
||||
|
||||
@override_system_checks([])
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
|
||||
def test_makemigrations_merge_no_conflict(self):
|
||||
|
@ -386,13 +373,18 @@ class MakeMigrationsTests(MigrationTestBase):
|
|||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_conflict"})
|
||||
def test_makemigrations_handle_merge(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Makes sure that makemigrations properly merges the conflicting migrations.
|
||||
Makes sure that makemigrations properly merges the conflicting migrations with --noinput.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
stdout = six.StringIO()
|
||||
call_command("makemigrations", "migrations", merge=True, stdout=stdout)
|
||||
call_command("makemigrations", "migrations", merge=True, interactive=False, stdout=stdout)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Merging migrations", stdout.getvalue())
|
||||
self.assertIn("Branch 0002_second", stdout.getvalue())
|
||||
self.assertIn("Branch 0002_conflicting_second", stdout.getvalue())
|
||||
merge_file = os.path.join(self.test_dir, 'test_migrations_conflict', '0003_merge.py')
|
||||
self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(merge_file))
|
||||
os.remove(merge_file)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(merge_file))
|
||||
self.assertIn("Created new merge migration", stdout.getvalue())
|
||||
|
||||
@override_system_checks([])
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_no_default"})
|
||||
|
@ -469,3 +461,28 @@ class MakeMigrationsTests(MigrationTestBase):
|
|||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(os.path.join(self.test_dir,
|
||||
"test_migrations_path_doesnt_exist", "foo", "bar",
|
||||
"0001_initial.py")))
|
||||
|
||||
@override_system_checks([])
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_conflict"})
|
||||
def test_makemigrations_interactive_by_default(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Makes sure that the user is prompted to merge by default if there are
|
||||
conflicts and merge is True. Answer negative to differentiate it from
|
||||
behavior when --noinput is specified.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Monkeypatch interactive questioner to auto reject
|
||||
old_input = questioner.input
|
||||
questioner.input = lambda _: "N"
|
||||
stdout = six.StringIO()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
call_command("makemigrations", "migrations", merge=True, stdout=stdout)
|
||||
merge_file = os.path.join(self.test_dir, 'test_migrations_conflict', '0003_merge.py')
|
||||
# This will fail if interactive is False by default
|
||||
self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(merge_file))
|
||||
except CommandError:
|
||||
self.fail("Makemigrations failed while running interactive questioner")
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
questioner.input = old_input
|
||||
if os.path.exists(merge_file):
|
||||
os.remove(merge_file)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("Created new merge migration", stdout.getvalue())
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue